Chargement...
Chargement...
DAROS separates evidence of a requested action from evidence of its actual effect. A security record is useful when its scope, source, and limitations are explicit.
Signals, assets, and observations associated with an event.
The policy or operating context used to qualify the situation.
The human or controlled approval that authorized the action, where required.
The instruction sent to the selected enforcement component.
What the endpoint or service actually reported back.
A reviewable chronology that preserves the sequence and its limitations.
A device reports suspicious activity. Operators review the context. A response is authorized within policy. The response is sent. The platform records whether execution and an observed effect were confirmed.
Illustrative example only. It does not describe a real customer or prove a specific outcome.
Each domain of the DAROS trust architecture is documented in a dedicated page.
The DAROS trust model at a glance - philosophy, pillars, and verification.
Access governance, protected connections, runtime boundaries, and tenant isolation.
Workload and human identity, MFA, RBAC/ABAC, approval gates, emergency access.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, CIS Controls, GDPR, DORA - with roadmap.